Something posted here a few days ago bothered Councilmen Ernie Wade and Jim VanHoozier, who both want it made clear they fully support the most recent appointee to the Planning Commission.
Mr. VanHoozier indicated he had the highest respect for Steve Huppert, and Mr. Wade pointed out he had seconded the motion to appoint him -- and that council vote was, in fact, unanimous.
A reference to caucasing with another council member after the Planning Commission meeting on Nov. 17 was disputed. A quick search of this term shows one definition:
"In United States politics and government, caucus has several distinct but related meanings. One meaning is a meeting of members of a political party or subgroup to coordinate members' actions, choose group policy, or nominate candidates for various offices...a subgrouping of officials with shared affinities or ethnicity who convene, often but not always to advocate, agitate, lobby or to vote collectively."
Council's appointed member to the Planning Commission is Councilwoman Ann Carter. Frequently, other council members are also seen in attendance at these meetings, particularly those who came to town council from this appointed body, without intending to influence these decisions or discussions.
A problem may occur any time three or more council members are present at any given time or place, and any town business matter is touched upon. A related article about a presentation made for Culpepper Town Council by Maria Everett, director of the Virginia Freedom of Information Council, suggests officials should imagine they have a blinking tattoo on their forehead. "Want to 'talk shop' with a few fellow councilmen at church? Beep! Beep! Beep! she said, describing the tattoo lighting up in warning."
Good intentions aside, Christiansburg officials should err on the side of caution. Even casual encounters of appointees or council members should steer clear of these individuals engaging in dialog relative to any town business, thereby possibly convening an impromptu public meeting.
This is especially true where trust is being reestablished between citizens and a town council that previously seemed oblivious to FOIA compliance.